Jumaat, 30 November 2012

Internet as a tool of soft power



 A KTO(Korean Tourism Organization) survey conducted in May last year showed that K-pop has indeed overtaken K-drama as the main purveyor of Hallyu in Malaysia and elsewhere. The survey revealed that, driven mainly by the Internet and social media network, more than 53.3% of 12,085 fans from 102 countries chose K-pop as the Hallyu aspect that interested them most.
(The Star, Aug 2012)
Ever wonder how Korean Wave or known as Hallyu became a sensation? It didn’t happen over midnight. K-pop has been embraced by the South Korea government as a tool for soft power aboard targeting the youth and trying to make it into Hollywood of Asia. ‘Soft power’ –the ability to co-opt rather than command and it involves using non-material resources like culture as means to control in according to the definition by Joseph Nye. My question before typing this post- I was curious how all this South Korean singers manage to land a metaphoric bomb over Asia. In ‘The New Yorker’, an article written by John Seabrook stated that the Korean music company is hoping to do is change a thing in the unique system of ‘cultural technology’

Cultural technology is a part of the ‘technology’ initiatives of the South Korean government in 2001 and was supported by policies and R&D investment. It is a 3-step process in becoming the Korea wave which is the training process, international collaborations and joint ventures. In contrary, John Seabrook is skeptical about it and commented that ‘this cultural technology as factory –like system whereby the entire eye shadow colour to the hand gestures is pre-determined by formulae and protocol and the music is too ‘robotic’ for Western market.

In Malaysia, we can even see that the government is giving what the youth wants by paying huge sum of money flying in those K stars to perform and entertain the audiences. Some party thinks is a waste of money for the state, but at the same time it could win the heart of the youth as voter. There is a great dispute over this matter whether it is too much to spend for this entertainment.One Million Youth Gathering 2012 in Putrajaya,K-pop acts were featured to attract young voters and many politicians have not hesitated to K-pop name drop on their social media network to hip up their image.(Azizan,2012)

 This could be some indirectly ‘sweet giving’ if you know what I mean. Apart from this,  it has certainly caught the youths' attention  especially girls going crazy over them and this leads to all sort of craziness and obsessions  like queuing up a day before to purchase their concert ticket, CD or even for ‘meet-and-greet’ session. By doing so, it boost in trade between South Korea and Malaysia  but it would be some burdens for those diehard fans who are eager to attend their idol’s concert but the tickets price are just too pricey especially for youngster who are still students and not financially independent. NO? YES?  

Undeniable fact #1 K pop fans will emulate the fashion they see in South Korea dramas, wore by the celebrities and etc. This is believed to create greater distance among youths’ own rich culture and traditions.
The invention of the technology aided the Kpop artist gaining exposure globally through social networks such as YouTube,Facebook, Twitter  as medium for these South Korean artist outreach wider audience. A Youtube video can go viral just like the Oppa Gangnam Style that has received million of views on Youtube and many youth had made parody out of it. Can you tell this is another form of cultural imperialism? Some may not understand the language behind it, the meaning of lyrics but they are still humming along the song. Are we just following blindly because it is mainstream? 

On the other hand, youths are using the technology to gain the latest update about their idols from the  forum, fanpage, Facebook and some of the idol themselves  are interacting  with their fans via Facebook,Instagram, Kakao Talk and etc that got more girls hooked up with them. Instead of the youth using the social media to outreach their idol, idol themselves also used many form of social network to interact with their fans for example Super Junior. President Obama during his speech in Korea said the two largest and popular social networking sites Kakao Talk and Me2day transmits 1 billion messages daily. He praised the young Koreans’ optimism and tech savvy. Tech savvy really heightened the chance of you getting to interact with your favourite star.

Jim Dator and Yongseok Seo(in Korea as the Wave of a future) remained optimistic that this Korean Wave will continue to succeed. Perhaps the Korean Wave is just a passing fad not the future, only time will tell
This blog post is trying to show how the sensation of K pop culture comes about as form of soft power culture imperialism that you and I may not realize? We may be ‘invaded’ but we aren’t aware about it. Look at yourself and ask yourself, whether are you ‘invaded’??


Goh Yun Chin 

Kenapa belia kini terikat dengan laman rangkaian sosial?


 Mutakhir ini, teknologi maklumat berkembang pesat dan menjadikan dunia ini dapat berhubung tanpa sempadan. Internet merupakan satu saluran maklumat yang digunakan secara luas. Kita dapat melihat bahawa semua peringkat umur menggunakan Internet untuk tujuan mereka sendiri, sama ada untuk berkomunikasi, mendidik, menyebarkan maklumat ataupun menghibur.
Berdasarkan statistik Majlis Teknologi Maklumat Kebangsaan (NITC), jumlan pengguna internet di Malaysia tahun 2010 mencecah 16.9 juta orang. Di Malaysia, antara rangkaian sosial yang paling popular adalah laman sosial Facebook dengan catatan kira-kira 6.2 juta pengunjung. Laman sosial ini kini dijadikan sebagai satu budaya di kalangan belia di Amerika dalam masa yang singkat. Selain itu, teknologi ini terus menjadi sebahagian yang penting dalam kehidupan sosial belia. Dalam hal demikian, muncullah beberapa persoalan yang penting seperti mengapakah belia selalu mempunyai keinginan untuk melayari laman sosial? Apakah yang belia dapat perolehi melalui penyertaan dalam laman sosial? Bagaimanakah laman sosial ini mempengaruhi kehidupan sosial belia? Matlamat post ini adalah untuk membincangkan sebab-sebab belia terikat dengan laman sosial.
Seperti yang di atas, kita boleh melihat rangkaian sosial yang paling popular ialah Facebook. Ia telah menjadi satu budaya baru atau trend yang perlu diikuti oleh pengguna Internet. Percayailah kebanyakan belia tidak kira kepada mereka yang sedang belajar mahupun telah bekerja mestinya mempunyai akaun Facebook sendiri dan sudah tertagih dengannya. Kebiasaannya mereka menggunakan Facebook ini adalah bertujuan menghiburkan sendiri dengan bersembang dan berkongsi apa-apa sahaja dengan kawan mereka. Sebagai contoh, ‘today I am not so happy’, ‘geram betul jumpa dia semasa I pergi kelas’, ‘adui,perut sakit!’ dan sebagainya. Selain itu, Restaurant City, Tetris Battle, Farmville adalah beberapa contoh permainan yang paling popular di kalangan pengguna Facebook. Permainan ini boleh membuatkan pemain ingin terus bermain kerana mereka ingin menaikkan tahap mereka dalam permainan
tersebut. Hal ini akan menyebabkan mereka semakin ketagih atas permainan tersebut. Hal ini akan menyebabkan belia malas untuk belajar dan bekerja. Adakah berbaloi bagi belia untuk membuangkan masa atas Facebook?

   Tambahan pula, tekanan yang dihadapi oleh belia juga menyebabkan mereka terjerumus dalam rangkaian sosial. Sebagai contoh, pelajar sekolah selalunya sibuk menghadiri tuisyen,ceramah,kem motivasi seumpama sedang bertanding dengan masa. Manakala bagi belia yang sedang bekerja pula sibuk mengejar kakayaan supaya tidak dipandang rendah oleh masyarakat. Kehidupan yang sebegini memanglah amat tertekan. Jadi, tidaklah hairan jika belia merasa seronok semasa melayari laman rangkaian sosial disamping dapat merehat diri dan mendapat hiburan. Mereka akan bersembang dengan rakan maya, memuat turun lagu percuma, menonton drama dan sebagainya. Selain itu, belia dapat berkawan dengan kawan yang baru melalui laman rangkaian sosial malahan kenalan lama mungkin dapat ditemui semula dengan adanya rangkaian sosial tersebut.
Lantaran itu, laman web peribadi juga merupakan satu tarikan bagi belia dalam laman rangkaian sosial. Menurut Turkle, laman web peribadi seperti blogs atau e-diari telah menawarkan pentas bagi belia untuk menyuarakan perasaan dan pendapat mereka. Saya tidak bersetuju dengan pernyataan Turkle. Hal ini disebabkan apa-apa yang diluahkan mestinya akan ditapis oleh pihak tertentu mahupun dikehendaki untuk memadamkan post tersebut sekiranya menyentuh isu-isu yang tidak ingin dibangkit. Namun, terdapat sebilangan penulis belia menggunakan perkataan “therapeutic’’ untuk menggambarkan bagaimana rasanya untuk meluahkan perasaan dalam talian selepas mengalami tekanan, kesedihan, kemarahan atau pengkhianatan.
Justeru, teknologi komunikasi ini juga membawa kesan dan pengaruh kepada belia dalam kehidupan mereka. Sebagai contoh, terdapat seorang wanita Amerika dibunuh oleh kekasihnya kerana menukar status berkahwin kepada bujang di Facebook, kes jerat siber, kes penipuan wang, dan seumpamanya. Adakah semua ini salah teknologi yang semakin canggih? Ataupun salah belia
sendiri? Fikirkan! Belia merupakan golongan yang memainkan peranan yang penting dalam memajukan negara ke arah yang lebih cerah pada masa akan datang. Jadi, belia mestilah selalu berfikir secara kritikal bahawa konteks sesuatu semasa menggunakan teknologi komunikasi ini dan bukan selalu jadi pengikut orang lain sahaja.


Beh Yan Peng

Jumaat, 23 November 2012

It is Time We Think About it.


Youth and Social Networking Sites.

Anthony Mayfield says that social network sites allow people to build personal web pages and then connect with friends to share content and communication. While social networking sites are expanding, I will specifically write about Facebook because it has the highest amount of users in the world. So how big of a deal is Facebook anyway? The answer could be very much or very little. Well, it is actually more complex from what is seems, seeing how Facebook has evolved since its existence. Since its introduction, Facebook has been used mainly for communication purpose. The truth is while we are moving forward with time, so is the purpose of Facebook. The table below shows the top social networking sites in the world.


TOP 7 SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES IN THE WORLD

Rank
Sites
Estimated unique monthly users
1.
Facebook
55,0000000
2.
Twitter
   95800000
3.
Myspace
   80500000
4.
Linkedin
   50000000
5.
Ning
   42000000
6.
Tagged
   30000000
7.
Classmates
   29000000

According to Edward Boches, Professor of the Practice of Advertising at Boston University’s College of Communications, he claims that there has been a debate between the old media and the new media. As a response to that, he points out that the question, of course, is whether Facebook is a social media network or an advertising medium.  Brands and organizations tend to reach out to youth where they are which is on Facebook. The advancement in technology has made the advertising sectors shifting to Facebook as a platform to reach out to youth. Now, why youth? This is because youth spend most their time on Facebook more than Google or Youtube.
Here are some of the examples of advertising on Facebook.
1. (RED) ™
(RED) is a non-profit organization that has team up with large brand 
names like Nike, Apple, and Starbucks. The organization’s main objective is to bring awareness and help fight AIDs in Africa. (RED) launched a Facebook campaign to spread awareness to and induce engagement in users and businesses on Facebook. It used Facebook targeting to put its ads out to people who had specific Likes and Interests listed in their profiles



Results:
·      In the first week, the (RED) Facebook Page gained 225,000 fans
·      Over the course of the campaign, the fan count rose 117%
·      On World AIDs Day, the (RED) Facebook Page was the third-highest Page gaining fans at 148 likes per minute
·      Over 100,000 changed their profile pictures to a (RED) photo or shared the (RED) Awareness Video

2. Adidas Originals
Adidas, in a six-month long campaign, wanted to increase the number of connections on its Facebook page, generate video engagement, and re-introduce itself as a modern, trendy fashion brand. The company introduced the campaign that featured Premium Video Comment Ads targeted at 18- to 34-year-olds in 11 different countries. The company used keywords like “Star Wars,” “science fiction,” “fashion,” and “Lady Gaga” in people’s Likes and Interests to target them as well.

Results:
·  The Adidas Originals Facebook Page reached almost 230,000 fans, a 6% increase
·  The video ads resulted in over 722,000 engagements
·  The Originals store had steadily increasing traffic during the campaign on Facebook.
   Many customers noted their interest in the product came from the social media site.

The results show that it is a good sign for the advertisers on Facebook because it is so easy to attract fans. It has been easier for them to get global. We have to question if Facebook is an appropriate medium for advertising. Personally, the accidental click on the ads or pop ups has made me very frustrated honestly. Trust me, I get very annoyed. Resulting from these, I tend to ignore the ads very much. Maybe we can ask ourselves whether we are easily buying these marketing strategies here.

On the other hand, Christine Greenhow of University of Minnesota conducted a research on “Engaging Youth in Social Media: Is Facebook the New Media Frontier?” She argues whether if youth can be persuaded to critically engage in news and conversation on Facebook? Can they feel a sense of community? Furthermore, can their involvement translate into realworld actions, or will it consist solely of virtual activism? And, if we understood how young people prefer to manipulate, produce and talk through information online, would that move us closer to understanding how to develop successful media‐rich and educational environments?

Conversations on Facebook consist mainly of normal conversations rather than critical engagement. John Perry Barlow says that cyberspace promises a space whereby it is global and anti-sovereign whereby anyone can voice out their opinions. Is this completely true? I have to say that it is supposed to be true but let’s face it. It is not entirely true. I have to disagree with his statement because we are always bound by control and filtering of contents.  This issue here tells us that we are not given the chance to voice out our honest opinion. So this matter question about the voice of the youth being heard and whether the youth is being taken seriously in the development of our community.

“Social networking sites are not only popular for providing a platform for chatting, sharing scraps, videos, pictures etc. but also for discussing social issues. However, certain issues yet require study and research like impact of SNS on youth’s minds and loss of privacy as earlier people believed in keeping their data private but now they enjoy going public and showing wall posts, status updates, tweets and in fact every thrill of their lives.” (Jain, Gupta & Anand, 2012)

This blog post is derived from different perspectives on Facebook as the new medium in our daily lives.  The purpose of this post is to urge youth to think critically and not be passive in the virtual world as well as the real world. I do agree with Christine Greenhow because it questions youth’s action because it tends to be merely virtual activism nowadays.

Ask yourself, what is your definition of Facebook in your own context? The world has categorized us as the Generation Y because we are said to be equipped with skills and talents compared to the older generations. Are we advancing forward or are we slacking behind instead? It all boils down to the identity of youth and what technology is doing to us. Who are you and how do you use the technology?  What do we have to do to be heard?  


Written by,
Michelle Wong.


References:

1. Boches, E. (2010, January 30) It’s time for advertising and social media to work together. Retrieved from http://edwardboches.com/its-time-for-advertising-and-social-media-to-work-together
2. Greenhow, C. (2008). Engaging Youth in Social Media: Is Facebook the New Media Frontier? Minnesota: University of Minnesota.
3. Jain, M. R., Gupta, P., & Anand, M. (2012). Impact of Social Networking Sites in the Changing Mindsets of Youth on Social Issues – A study on Delhi-NCR Youth. Journals of Arts, Science & Commerce, 36-43.
4. Keath, J. 105 (2012, June 19) Facebook Advertising Case Studies. Retrieved from http://socialfresh.com/facebook-advertising-examples/
5.  Mayfield, M. What is Social Media? Retrieved August 1, 2008, from http://www.icrossing.co.uk/fileadmin/uploads/eBooks/What_is_Social_Media_iCrossing_ebook.pdf

  

Jumaat, 16 November 2012

Budaya Plagiarism di kalangan belia

-PENGENALAN-

Plagiarism mengikut Kamus Dewan Edisi Ketiga sebagai mencedok kata, idea dan sebagainya daripada orang lain dan menggunakannya sebagai karya sendiri, tiruan atau menciplak.
Dari segi bidang akademik pula bermaksud 'gejala meniru oleh pelajar, profesor penyelidik dan dianggap sebagai penyelewengan akademik. Dari segi bidang kewartawanan pula menganggap plagiarism sebagai pencabulan etika kewartawanan dan pemberita yang didapati menciplak akan dikenakan tindakan tatatertib termasuklah diberhentikan kerja.

-KAJIAN TENTANG BUDAYA PLAGIARISME DI KALANGAN MAHASISWA-
Mengikut sesuatu kajian yang telah dijalankan oleh Hudi Hutomo Hadi mengenai Plagiarisme Penyelesaian Tugas Akademik di Kalangan Mahasiswa FISIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang Indonesia, beliau menganggap bahawa segala interaksi dalam sosial adalah berdasarkan faktor “peniruan”-“imitation factors”. Ia akan melahirkan impak positif dan negatif juga jika perbuatan atau amalan yang diikuti adalah salah dan mampu meninggalkan kesan yang negatif. Dengan sedemikian, jelas menunjukkan bahawa perbuatan plagiarisme merupakan salah satu proses peniruan yang negatif kerana ia menunjukkan sesuatu perbuatan yang tidak beretika dan saling tidak tumpah konsepnya seumpama merompak.

Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengenal pasti sebab-sebab pelajar universiti mengamalkan “instant culture” iaitu plagiarisme untuk menjawab kertas soalan peperiksaan akhir tahun dan untuk melengkapi kerja tugasan yang diarahkan pada setiap semester. Keputusan yang diperolehi amat menyecewakan kerana selepas menjalankan pendekatan “case study” sebagai kaedah kualitatif dan koleksi pandangan informants dan penjelasan daripada pensyarah Komunikasi untuk kajian ini, ia dibuktikan bahawa budaya plagiarisme sebagai sikap “instant culture” sedang merebak di kalangan mahasiswa.

Dalam satu kajian ke atas 50,000 siswa oleh Center of Academic Integrity (Jun 2005) di kalangan mahasiswa di Amerika Syarikat juga berpendapat bahawa 70% pelajar-pelajar kolej terlibat dalam budaya plagiat; iaitu seramai 77% pelajar-pelajar kolej tidak sedar bahawa plagiarisme adalah satu isu yang serius. Oleh yang demikian, "The digital revolution is creating a generation of cut-and-paste burglars who view all content on the internet as common property". Budaya yang tidak pernah surut membelenggu dunia akademik ini mampu menggugat kualiti graduan dihasilkan.

-PANDANGAN MENGENAI BUDAYA PLAGIARISME-
Mengikut Timbalan Naib Canselor (Akademik dan Antarabangsa) Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Profesor Dr Omar Abdull Kareem berkata, budaya plagiarisme yang tidak dibendung mampu ‘menghakis’ dan membunuh usaha melahirkan golongan akademik berwibawa. Budaya itu, menurutnya boleh dianggap sebagai parasit kerana bukan sekadar membinasakan kredibiliti, malah menyebabkan mereka berterusan memplagiat tanpa menghiraukan penat lelah orang lain.

Malahan, terdapat segelintir pelajar menganggap budaya “copy and paste” adalah cara yang mudah dan senang untuk menghabiskan kerja tugasan yang diarahkan oleh pensyarah. Menjelang era digital revolusi pada abad ini, pelajar dapat memperolehi segala maklumat yang diperlukan hanya melalui satu “click” sahaja di GOOGLE.com. Tambahan pula, maklumat yang dapat diperolehi bukan sahaja dalam bentuk artikel atau laporan berita sahaja mahupun sebuah tesis/journal yang melengkapi dengan idea-idea yang sempurna. Maka sukar untuk individu untuk menahan niat sendirian untuk “copy dan paste” seluruh maklumat yang sudah berada untuk melengkapi tugasannya. Selain itu, kadang-kala pelajar menghadapi masalah limitasi masa untuk membuat tugasan yang disuruhkan. Oleh itu, pada keadaan yang sedemikan dan kemudahan untuk mendapati maklumat melalui Internet, jalan yang begitu mudah sebegini ini, adakah anda sanggup mengelakkan diri daripada kegiatan tersebut? Jika anda sanggup, persoalan ditimbulkan lagi bahawa terdapat beberapa pelajar atau cendekiawan belia dapat mengawal diri seperti anda?

Tidak dapat dinafikan juga amalan ini amat memalu dan mengecewakan apabila ahli akademik serta warga institusi pengajian tinggi yang diiktiraf intelektual, profesional serta terpelajar masih dibelenggu budaya plagiarisme hingga menjatuhkan taraf kredibiliti
golongan terbabit. Sebagai cara pencegahan atau alternatif untuk mengelakkan masalah ini bertambah serius, perisian komputer seperti Word Check System, Turnitin dan Scan My Essay banyak diaplikasikan oleh universiti di seluruh dunia dan dilihat sangat berkesan dalam memastikan kewujudan elemen plagiarisme dalam penyediaan kajian ilmiah, tesis dan penulisan akademik lain secara atas talian.

Kesimpulannya, pelajar atau cendekiawan sekalian haruslah bijak menggunakan minda yang kreatif dan kritis. Sikap sambil lewa daripada pandangan seluruh masyarakat juga mendorong budaya “instant” ini terus berleluasa. Pensyarah atau “Educator” perlu lebih prihatin dan memberi etika belajar yang perlu diikuti untuk mengekang budaya plagiarisme.

-SUMBER- 
1.   Hudi Hutomo Hadi, (2008) in Budaya Plagiarisme di kalangan mahasiswa (Studi Kasus pada Budaya Plagiarisme Penyelesaian Tugas Akademik di Kalangan Mahasiswa FISIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang).
2. Ruhaiza Rusmin dan Ihsan Noorzali, (2011.12.18). Calar imej cendekiawan. myMetro Online. Dipetik daripada http://www.hmetro.com.my/articles/Calarimejcendekiawan/Article

LIM SU HUI